No dramatic effects from a magnetic reversal?

“The fossil record shows no drastic changes in plant or animal life,” says this article on SOTT. I beg to differ.

The earth’s magnetic field has flipped many times over the millennia, says the article. Magnetic reversals happen all the (geologic) time.

“Many doomsday theorists suggest that a magnetic reversal could lead to Earth’s destruction,”  the article continues. “But would there be any dramatic effects?”

“The answer, from the geologic and fossil records we have from hundreds of past magnetic polarity reversals, seems to be ‘no,'” the article asserts. During the last major reversal about 780,000 years ago, the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal, “the fossil record shows no drastic changes in plant or animal life. Deep ocean sediment cores from this period also indicate no changes in glacial activity.”

“A weaker field would certainly lead to a small increase in solar radiation on Earth,” the article continues, “but nothing deadly.”

Nor would it happen fast. “The science shows that magnetic pole reversal is – in terms of geologic time scales – a common occurrence that happens gradually over millennia.”

I beg to differ on almost all counts.

Here’s how I put it in Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps (citations are included in the book):

You’ll often hear that the most recent magnetic reversal occurred about 780,000 years ago at the Brunhes/ Matuyama boundary. But that date is way off the mark. At least ten magnetic reversals and excursions, probably many more, have ravaged our planet during the past 780,000 years.

Laschamp magnetic reversal

In 1967, Norbert Bonhommet and J. Babkine discovered a geomagnetic reversal in lava flows at Laschamp and Olby, at Chaîne des Puys (chain of volcanoes) in central France. Our magnetic field reversed about twenty to thirty thousand years ago, they announced, and then remained reversed for about ten thousand years. They called it the Laschamp magnetic reversal. Is it just a coincidence, Bonhommet asked, that the return to normal polarity corresponded with the end of an ice age?

Though later research placed the Laschamp event at around 44,000 years ago, its discovery made us aware that other magnetic reversals or excursions might have occurred.

Gothenburg magnetic excursion

The most recent excursion, the Gothenburg magnetic excursion, occurred about 12,350 years ago. During that excursion, magnetic intensity fell dramatically, to about twenty percent of the Holocene average. At the same time, magnetic inclination moved 180o. It also fluctuated, making wild swings of up 80°.

Mono Lake magnetic excursion

Another magnetic excursion, the Mono Lake excursion, occurred about 23,000 years ago. During the Mono Lake event, magnetic intensity fell ten times faster than normal.

Lake Mungo magnetic excursion

Before that came the Lake Mungo excursion of 33,500 years ago. And prior to that came the “real” Laschamp event of about 47,000 years ago, when magnetic intensity fell to less than 15% of today’s (All magnetic reversals and excursions show major decreases in intensity.)

See the cycle?

Those excursions struck like clockwork every 11,500 years, and they’ve been doing it for millions of years.

Geomagnetic reversals about 10,000 years apart have been found in the 65-million-year-old Deccan Traps, said geophysicist Vincent Courtillot. Indeed, 10,000-year hiatuses between lavas of opposite polarities are observed “frequently.”

Other scientists agree. Magnetic intensity fluctuations of from two to 30,000 years’ duration appear in the marine record as “tiny wiggles” and are therefore easy to overlook, said Steven  Cande and Dennis Kent of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. We believe that this type of  behavior of  tiny  wiggles,  they  said, “may have characterized the geomagnetic dynamo throughout the Cenozoic [the last 65 million years].”

I think we’ll eventually find millions of such “tiny wiggles” in the geologic record.

Geomagnetic reversals and ice ages

But here’s the topper: Catastrophic cooling and rapid ice build-up accompanied many of those magnetic reversals and excursions. At least twelve ice ages can be correlated with magnetic reversals and excursions in the past two million years alone.

The Gothenburg magnetic excursion coincided with a period of short-term ice and snow, said Michael R. Rampino of NASA, as did the Lake Mungo excursion, when rapid cooling immediately followed a period of warmth.

The Mono Lake magnetic excursion coincided with glaciation; the Blake magnetic reversal at the end-Eemian coincided with glaciation, as did Biwa I, Biwa II, and  Biwa III.

Each of those catastrophic cooling episodes, said Rampino, “may have been triggered by a magnetic excursion. The Earth’s magnetic field may be directly modulated by precession.”

So there you have it.

Polarity reversals, equinoctial precession, and ice ages, all march to the same drummer. As do extinctions and new species appearance. Toss in the specter of massive amounts of radioactivity falling on your head, and you’ve got the picture.

Look at the number of catastrophes that have befallen our planet in sync with magnetic reversals during the last 115,000 years alone:

Catastrophes in sync with equinoctial precession
(kya = thousands of years)

115 kya – Blake magnetic reversal. Spikes in radioactive carbon-14 and strontium.  Ice age begins abruptly following a period of warmth similar to today’s. Sea levels surge 20 feet, then plunge at least 50 feet, in less than a century.

43 kya – Laschamps magnetic excursion. Beryllium spike (three times normal). Carbon-14 spike (two times normal). Ice age begins abruptly. Rising reefs.

34 kya – Lake Mungo magnetic excursion. Beryllium spike. Carbon-14 spike (almost twice normal). Short-term ice build-up, then ice age ends abruptly. Lake Missoula flood. Lake Bonneville flood. Intensive volcanism. Neanderthal disappears.

23 kya – Mono Lake magnetic excursion. Ice age begins abruptly. Major volcanism. Spikes in radioactive beryllium and carbon-14 (four to five times normal). Mass extinction. European forest elephant disappears. Mammoths clobbered.

11 kya – Gothenburg magnetic excursion. Mass extinction; 72% of large mammal species go extinct, whereas only 10% of small mammal species disappear. Spikes in radioactive carbon-14 (three to four times normal), beryllium-10 (two to three times normal), iridium (two to three times normal). Spikes in CO2 and many other elements. Rapid and severe ice build-up, then ice age ends in less than 20 years and today’s warm period begins. Worldwide volcanism. Nile River flood.  Connecticut River flood. Lake Missoula flood. Lake Bonneville flood. Gulf of Mexico flood. St. Lawrence River flood. Worldwide tectonic uplift. Creation of the Carolina Bays.

And that brings us to today, frighteningly unprepared for the next beat of the magnetic-reversal cycle.

(By the way, I think those spikes in radioactive beryllium, strontium, iridium and carbon-14 lead to mutations and evolutionary leaps. And they say there would be “no dramatic effects”?)

See entire SOTT article:

Thanks to Peter Lamb for this link


4 thoughts on “No dramatic effects from a magnetic reversal?”

  1. It’s not just a flip of the compass.

    The Glatzmaier-Roberts supercomputer model, which took one year of supercomputer time to calculate, shows reversals to be very complex and chaotic. Nature tends to be that way. The animated model shows the reversal taking 1,200 years to complete.

    The Glatzmaier-Roberts .mpg movie is fascinating to watch:

    Watching the chaos of the reversal in freeze frame mode several things are apparent. Many times there is definitely no clear North or South pole. Other times multiple small (weak) poles are seen. At other times huge sections of the planet have little or no magnetic field to deflect cosmic radiation.

    An extremely significant dynamic of the reversal is shown in this image:

    “Only when the whole field almost decays away, however, does it finally have a chance to diffuse in. Once it does, the opposite polarity gets established.” In other words (as the image shows) the pre-reversal magnetic activity happens largely within the confines of the planet’s exterior, and there is essentially no magnetic field outside of the Earth’s crust. That is what the image makes clear. During this period Earth has no substantial magnetic field to protect plants and animals from the ongoing bombardment of numerous high-energy massive particles and the low-energy cosmic radiation particles.

    Note: As a Medical Radiation Technologist I can assure you that low energy particles are also quite dangerous. Low energy radiation is mostly absorbed by an organism, while high energy particles can either be absorbed (causing DNA mutation) or they can pass directly through, causing no adverse effects.

    Best wishes to all for the Christmas season.

    Norm in BC

  2. The sun reverse in a matter of months and that is large compared to the earth. Yes the Sun is a different composition to the earth but still the flip was quick and not 1200 years but measured in months.

    So would not be surprised if a reversal occurred on earth that it takes weeks or even days, maybe as little as 40 hours.

    Also cannot find the article now but the Sun created multiple south poles. This is what a magnetic reversal will look like here on earth too. A good marker of what to look out for, south pole anomalies. Once we start seeing multiple south poles and some of these birds falling from the sky and fishes washing ashore could be multiple poles (I believe south is where the multiple poles will exhibit themselves) starting to form.

    Finally it is very likely Earths magnetic field reversal will coincide with the Sun’s magnetic reversal. If so watch out because as per the article below, it will likely be accompanied by very big solar flares and CME’s.

    Expect a real possiblilty of a Carrington event CME/Solar flare, Sun magnetic flip, earth magnetic flip then ice age.

  3. I agree a connection seems to exist but i think the missing link is in the strasophere, esp ozone. Has anyone considere what effect it would have on it as it controls the altitude of the tropopause, which has a huge effect on global jet streams, pressure patterns and rain/snow. Also i worked out it the altitude of the tropopause were to rise, it would induce rapid cooling of the planet as overall surface pressure would drop, together with more snow. I personally think that could be a trigger for glaciation and the “nine stories of snow a day” prediction.


Leave a Comment

4 × 4 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.